<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 905 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153256</link>
    <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the auction confirmation, emphasizing the evidence supporting the confirmation. It found no error in the auction process or payment terms, highlighting the importance of understanding and adhering to auction conditions. The court concluded that the appellants&#039; bid confirmation was evident from correspondence with the respondents and denied the request to invoke arbitration provisions, stating the contract was concluded. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded, affirming the decision of the Learned Single Judge regarding the completed contract and the appellants&#039; attempt to retract from it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 905 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153256</link>
      <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the auction confirmation, emphasizing the evidence supporting the confirmation. It found no error in the auction process or payment terms, highlighting the importance of understanding and adhering to auction conditions. The court concluded that the appellants&#039; bid confirmation was evident from correspondence with the respondents and denied the request to invoke arbitration provisions, stating the contract was concluded. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded, affirming the decision of the Learned Single Judge regarding the completed contract and the appellants&#039; attempt to retract from it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>