https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153254 Professional misconduct by an advocate must be proved by clear and convincing evidence showing moral delinquency or dishonourable conduct; mere negligence, wrong advice, or error of judgment is insufficient. In the first incident, the evidence did not satisfactorily establish that the advocate knowingly prepared or used a false affidavit. In the second, the evidence was too inconclusive to link the advocate with the alleged affidavit or advice. Suspicion could not replace proof in disciplinary proceedings, so the charge of professional misconduct was not made out and the disciplinary finding was set aside. en-us Thu, 20 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153254 Professional misconduct by an advocate must be proved by clear and convincing evidence showing moral delinquency or dishonourable conduct; mere negligence, wrong advice, or error of judgment is insufficient. In the first incident, the evidence did not satisfactorily establish that the advocate knowingly prepared or used a false affidavit. In the second, the evidence was too inconclusive to link the advocate with the alleged affidavit or advice. Suspicion could not replace proof in disciplinary proceedings, so the charge of professional misconduct was not made out and the disciplinary finding was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153254