<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 230 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153248</link>
    <description>Paper and exercise books made from paper were treated as distinct commercial commodities because paper has multiple uses, while exercise books after conversion and sizing have a different identity and a limited use. The conversion created a separate marketable article, so the two goods were not the same commodity. Where a registered dealer purchased paper tax-free on a declaration for resale but converted it into exercise books before sale, the declared purpose was not fulfilled and the paper was used for a purpose other than resale in its original form. The statutory proviso therefore applied, and the value of the goods was includible in the dealer&#039;s taxable turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:36:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 230 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153248</link>
      <description>Paper and exercise books made from paper were treated as distinct commercial commodities because paper has multiple uses, while exercise books after conversion and sizing have a different identity and a limited use. The conversion created a separate marketable article, so the two goods were not the same commodity. Where a registered dealer purchased paper tax-free on a declaration for resale but converted it into exercise books before sale, the declared purpose was not fulfilled and the paper was used for a purpose other than resale in its original form. The statutory proviso therefore applied, and the value of the goods was includible in the dealer&#039;s taxable turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>