<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (5) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153242</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad considered the validity of rejecting the assessee&#039;s accounts books, which were disputed by the revising authority based on various reasons. However, lacking concrete evidence and support from the assessing and appellate authorities, the rejection was deemed unjustified. The court accepted the explanation for the absence of separate cash memos for retail sales as a reasonable practice, not indicative of tax evasion. Consequently, the rejection was overturned in favor of the assessee, who was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (5) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153242</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad considered the validity of rejecting the assessee&#039;s accounts books, which were disputed by the revising authority based on various reasons. However, lacking concrete evidence and support from the assessing and appellate authorities, the rejection was deemed unjustified. The court accepted the explanation for the absence of separate cash memos for retail sales as a reasonable practice, not indicative of tax evasion. Consequently, the rejection was overturned in favor of the assessee, who was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>