<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 154 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153231</link>
    <description>Where an assessment is completed under section 12(2) on accepted accounts, the assessing authority may add only the turnover actually found to have been omitted from the accounts. A further enhancement by estimate is not justified unless the accounts are rejected and a best judgment assessment is made under section 12(4). On the stated facts, the turnover could not be increased beyond the amount actually detected as left out of account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 154 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153231</link>
      <description>Where an assessment is completed under section 12(2) on accepted accounts, the assessing authority may add only the turnover actually found to have been omitted from the accounts. A further enhancement by estimate is not justified unless the accounts are rejected and a best judgment assessment is made under section 12(4). On the stated facts, the turnover could not be increased beyond the amount actually detected as left out of account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>