<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 192 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153213</link>
    <description>Section 17 rectification under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 is confined to mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used as a disguised review based on a later conflicting decision of the same Board. A debatable legal issue, or a fresh view taken in subsequent proceedings, does not create a rectifiable error where the earlier order was made on the materials then available. Judicial review also must proceed on the record before the authority when the impugned order was made, so a fresh letter of authority not produced earlier cannot be relied on to support the rectification. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 192 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153213</link>
      <description>Section 17 rectification under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 is confined to mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used as a disguised review based on a later conflicting decision of the same Board. A debatable legal issue, or a fresh view taken in subsequent proceedings, does not create a rectifiable error where the earlier order was made on the materials then available. Judicial review also must proceed on the record before the authority when the impugned order was made, so a fresh letter of authority not produced earlier cannot be relied on to support the rectification. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>