<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 191 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153188</link>
    <description>Locally purchased turmeric and black and white pepper, when only powdered, retained their commercial identity and did not become a new notified commodity under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. On the facts stated, the dealer was neither an importer nor a processor bringing a new taxable product into existence, so a further levy on the ground of manufacture or processing was unsustainable. A belated reassessment notice was also invalid because it lacked adequate fresh material, did not satisfy section 9(3), and could not be rescued by borrowing a longer period from the Limitation Act. The later 48-month limit under section 9(3A) reinforced the statutory bar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 191 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153188</link>
      <description>Locally purchased turmeric and black and white pepper, when only powdered, retained their commercial identity and did not become a new notified commodity under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. On the facts stated, the dealer was neither an importer nor a processor bringing a new taxable product into existence, so a further levy on the ground of manufacture or processing was unsustainable. A belated reassessment notice was also invalid because it lacked adequate fresh material, did not satisfy section 9(3), and could not be rescued by borrowing a longer period from the Limitation Act. The later 48-month limit under section 9(3A) reinforced the statutory bar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>