<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 147 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153181</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee, a printer and book-binder, for the assessment year 1974-75. The Tribunal determined that the transactions involved two distinct contracts - one for supply of materials and the other for labor charges, exempting the turnover from tax liability. The Court emphasized the importance of contract terms in determining tax liability, referencing legal precedents and highlighting the need for substantiated evidence in distinguishing between labor charges and material costs. The revision petition filed by the State was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:42:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 147 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153181</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee, a printer and book-binder, for the assessment year 1974-75. The Tribunal determined that the transactions involved two distinct contracts - one for supply of materials and the other for labor charges, exempting the turnover from tax liability. The Court emphasized the importance of contract terms in determining tax liability, referencing legal precedents and highlighting the need for substantiated evidence in distinguishing between labor charges and material costs. The revision petition filed by the State was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>