<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 268 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153150</link>
    <description>Cotton sewing thread was treated as cotton yarn for sales tax classification under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, because the Court followed its earlier Division Bench view and the clarification referred to in the judgment. On that construction, turnover from sewing thread attracted the special rate applicable to cotton yarn rather than the general rate for goods without a prescribed special rate, so the Revenue&#039;s contention for higher taxation failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:47:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 268 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153150</link>
      <description>Cotton sewing thread was treated as cotton yarn for sales tax classification under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, because the Court followed its earlier Division Bench view and the clarification referred to in the judgment. On that construction, turnover from sewing thread attracted the special rate applicable to cotton yarn rather than the general rate for goods without a prescribed special rate, so the Revenue&#039;s contention for higher taxation failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>