<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 248 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153142</link>
    <description>Retrospective enlargement of the statutory definition of cotton fabrics was read into the referential tax entry, so tarpaulins made from processed canvas cloth with waterproofing treatment fell within the expanded meaning of cotton fabrics under entry 37. The court rejected a use-based or commercial parlance approach because the specific defined entry controlled classification, and the legislative amendment operated as if the enlarged meaning had applied from the relevant date. Tarpaulins were therefore excluded from the residuary entry in Schedule III, and the alternative classification as articles prepared from textile fabrics under entry 18(a) was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 248 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153142</link>
      <description>Retrospective enlargement of the statutory definition of cotton fabrics was read into the referential tax entry, so tarpaulins made from processed canvas cloth with waterproofing treatment fell within the expanded meaning of cotton fabrics under entry 37. The court rejected a use-based or commercial parlance approach because the specific defined entry controlled classification, and the legislative amendment operated as if the enlarged meaning had applied from the relevant date. Tarpaulins were therefore excluded from the residuary entry in Schedule III, and the alternative classification as articles prepared from textile fabrics under entry 18(a) was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>