https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153141 An express saving proviso in section 43C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act retrospectively preserved tenancy rights acquired under the principal Act, notwithstanding earlier exclusionary amendments affecting municipal-borough lands. The proviso was treated as a substantive restoration clause, and the general saving provisions did not override its express language. The Court also reaffirmed that tenancy status and related issues fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Mamlatdar or Revenue Court under sections 70 and 85. After the 1956 amendment, the Civil Court had to stay the suit and refer such issues for determination, then proceed only in conformity with the revenue findings. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153141 An express saving proviso in section 43C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act retrospectively preserved tenancy rights acquired under the principal Act, notwithstanding earlier exclusionary amendments affecting municipal-borough lands. The proviso was treated as a substantive restoration clause, and the general saving provisions did not override its express language. The Court also reaffirmed that tenancy status and related issues fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Mamlatdar or Revenue Court under sections 70 and 85. After the 1956 amendment, the Civil Court had to stay the suit and refer such issues for determination, then proceed only in conformity with the revenue findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153141