https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153133 During the pendency of an appeal against an assessment order, recovery of disputed tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act remained permissible unless the appellate authority had issued an interim direction regarding payment and that direction had been complied with. The statutory requirement to pay admitted tax for admission of the appeal did not suspend recovery of the contested liability merely because an appeal was filed. The proviso limiting recovery applied only where a complied interim order existed; absence of such an order, or rejection of interim relief, did not bar recovery. Decisions cited by the assessee were distinguished as dealing with different contexts. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153133 During the pendency of an appeal against an assessment order, recovery of disputed tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act remained permissible unless the appellate authority had issued an interim direction regarding payment and that direction had been complied with. The statutory requirement to pay admitted tax for admission of the appeal did not suspend recovery of the contested liability merely because an appeal was filed. The proviso limiting recovery applied only where a complied interim order existed; absence of such an order, or rejection of interim relief, did not bar recovery. Decisions cited by the assessee were distinguished as dealing with different contexts. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153133