<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 188 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153130</link>
    <description>Additional tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could not be demanded from a commission agent before assessment where the statutory turnover threshold had not been established. The court noted that a commission agent&#039;s liability under section 11 is tied to transactions carried on on behalf of the principal, so the relevant turnover is that of the principal in a representative capacity. As the turnover for the period was only about Rs. 6.6 lakhs, below the Rs. 10 lakhs threshold, additional tax under section 6-B could not arise before the accounting year closed and assessment was completed. The demand was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 188 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153130</link>
      <description>Additional tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could not be demanded from a commission agent before assessment where the statutory turnover threshold had not been established. The court noted that a commission agent&#039;s liability under section 11 is tied to transactions carried on on behalf of the principal, so the relevant turnover is that of the principal in a representative capacity. As the turnover for the period was only about Rs. 6.6 lakhs, below the Rs. 10 lakhs threshold, additional tax under section 6-B could not arise before the accounting year closed and assessment was completed. The demand was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>