<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 310 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153128</link>
    <description>A criminal judgment must disclose the evidence considered and the reasons supporting the conclusions reached; a bare recital of findings is not a judgment in law. The SC noted that the trial court&#039;s order was perfunctory and cryptic, with no meaningful discussion of prosecution or defence evidence, which was especially serious in a murder case. Because the matter came before the Court as the first appeal on facts, it declined to undertake an original appraisal of the evidence and instead ordered remand. The conviction and acquittal were set aside, and the case was sent back for fresh disposal on the existing record after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 310 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153128</link>
      <description>A criminal judgment must disclose the evidence considered and the reasons supporting the conclusions reached; a bare recital of findings is not a judgment in law. The SC noted that the trial court&#039;s order was perfunctory and cryptic, with no meaningful discussion of prosecution or defence evidence, which was especially serious in a murder case. Because the matter came before the Court as the first appeal on facts, it declined to undertake an original appraisal of the evidence and instead ordered remand. The conviction and acquittal were set aside, and the case was sent back for fresh disposal on the existing record after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>