<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 82 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153127</link>
    <description>Section 12(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 was treated as a rule of decision governing a landlord&#039;s entitlement to recover possession, and it was applied to a suit pending when Part II extended to the area. The provision was read as operating at the stage when a decree for possession would otherwise be passed, rather than being confined to suits filed after the Act came into force. A landlord cannot recover possession while the tenant is ready and willing to pay standard rent, permitted increases, and comply with tenancy conditions; on the stated facts, the tenants fell within that protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 82 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153127</link>
      <description>Section 12(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 was treated as a rule of decision governing a landlord&#039;s entitlement to recover possession, and it was applied to a suit pending when Part II extended to the area. The provision was read as operating at the stage when a decree for possession would otherwise be passed, rather than being confined to suits filed after the Act came into force. A landlord cannot recover possession while the tenant is ready and willing to pay standard rent, permitted increases, and comply with tenancy conditions; on the stated facts, the tenants fell within that protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>