<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 250 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153115</link>
    <description>Where the Commissioner had, under section 3-B(4), vested assessment powers in the Assistant Commissioner for the relevant class of cases, clause (b) treated references to the Commercial Tax Officer or assessing authority as references to the Assistant Commissioner, and the Explanation extended that position to proceedings commenced after the order. Because the earlier assessment had already been completed and no proceeding was pending when the order was made, the Commercial Tax Officer was not the competent authority to initiate proceedings under section 12-A. The notice issued by him was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 250 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153115</link>
      <description>Where the Commissioner had, under section 3-B(4), vested assessment powers in the Assistant Commissioner for the relevant class of cases, clause (b) treated references to the Commercial Tax Officer or assessing authority as references to the Assistant Commissioner, and the Explanation extended that position to proceedings commenced after the order. Because the earlier assessment had already been completed and no proceeding was pending when the order was made, the Commercial Tax Officer was not the competent authority to initiate proceedings under section 12-A. The notice issued by him was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>