<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 176 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153099</link>
    <description>Goods sent outside Delhi for mixing and processing did not lose eligibility for retention in column 3(a) of the registration certificate where the processed compound was not a saleable commodity, the materials were brought back to Delhi, and the rubber goods were manufactured in Delhi. The legal effect of the amended provision was confined to goods intended for resale or for use as raw materials in manufacture in Delhi. External processing alone was treated as processing, not manufacture, and did not justify deletion of the entire registration entry, though the statute could permit inclusion of goods in taxable turnover if used for another purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 176 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153099</link>
      <description>Goods sent outside Delhi for mixing and processing did not lose eligibility for retention in column 3(a) of the registration certificate where the processed compound was not a saleable commodity, the materials were brought back to Delhi, and the rubber goods were manufactured in Delhi. The legal effect of the amended provision was confined to goods intended for resale or for use as raw materials in manufacture in Delhi. External processing alone was treated as processing, not manufacture, and did not justify deletion of the entire registration entry, though the statute could permit inclusion of goods in taxable turnover if used for another purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>