<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 254 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153097</link>
    <description>The appellate power under section 34 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was described as wide enough to cover not only the final tax computation but also each constituent step in the assessment process. On that basis, the appellate authority could examine the assessing authority&#039;s refusal to grant composition under section 7, including whether the exercise of discretion on delay was legal, proper, and fair. Once the condonation decision formed part of the assessment order, it remained subject to appellate scrutiny. The text also records a finding that sufficient cause existed for the delay, so consequential relief could be directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 254 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153097</link>
      <description>The appellate power under section 34 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was described as wide enough to cover not only the final tax computation but also each constituent step in the assessment process. On that basis, the appellate authority could examine the assessing authority&#039;s refusal to grant composition under section 7, including whether the exercise of discretion on delay was legal, proper, and fair. Once the condonation decision formed part of the assessment order, it remained subject to appellate scrutiny. The text also records a finding that sufficient cause existed for the delay, so consequential relief could be directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>