<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1014 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153082</link>
    <description>Tobacco treated with jaggery water to prevent moulding and drying remained cured tobacco and did not amount to manufacture of chewing tobacco. The HS Explanatory Notes to Heading 24.01 supported classification of such cured tobacco as unmanufactured tobacco. On that basis, the product was held classifiable under Heading 24.01 and not under Sub-heading 2404.41, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1014 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153082</link>
      <description>Tobacco treated with jaggery water to prevent moulding and drying remained cured tobacco and did not amount to manufacture of chewing tobacco. The HS Explanatory Notes to Heading 24.01 supported classification of such cured tobacco as unmanufactured tobacco. On that basis, the product was held classifiable under Heading 24.01 and not under Sub-heading 2404.41, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>