<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 247 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153073</link>
    <description>A retrospective validating amendment to the State Act, together with the corresponding amendment to the Central Sales Tax law, was treated as curing prior assessments made against dissolved firms; the later provision was held procedural in character and effective to validate those assessments. A tax recovery direction under the State Act, even when executed by the Magistrate in the manner of a fine, was held to remain recovery of tax and not a penal fine, so the six-year limitation for recovery of fines under the Penal Code did not apply. The commentary concludes that both the assessment challenge and the recovery challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 247 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153073</link>
      <description>A retrospective validating amendment to the State Act, together with the corresponding amendment to the Central Sales Tax law, was treated as curing prior assessments made against dissolved firms; the later provision was held procedural in character and effective to validate those assessments. A tax recovery direction under the State Act, even when executed by the Magistrate in the manner of a fine, was held to remain recovery of tax and not a penal fine, so the six-year limitation for recovery of fines under the Penal Code did not apply. The commentary concludes that both the assessment challenge and the recovery challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>