<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153069</link>
    <description>Old silver jewellery and silverware purchased for melting and conversion into new articles were treated as goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods, so purchase tax applied under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court also held that turnover under section 3(1) and turnover under section 7-A could not be treated as separate total turnovers for reduced-rate benefit, because the Act defines total turnover as the aggregate turnover in all goods. The statutory definition prevailed over the rules, so aggregation of both turnovers for liability and concessional rate purposes was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153069</link>
      <description>Old silver jewellery and silverware purchased for melting and conversion into new articles were treated as goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods, so purchase tax applied under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court also held that turnover under section 3(1) and turnover under section 7-A could not be treated as separate total turnovers for reduced-rate benefit, because the Act defines total turnover as the aggregate turnover in all goods. The statutory definition prevailed over the rules, so aggregation of both turnovers for liability and concessional rate purposes was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>