<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 215 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153061</link>
    <description>For the explanation to section 36(2)(c) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the expression &quot;tax paid&quot; was held to include not only tax remitted to the Government treasury but also tax allowed by way of set-off under the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959. The scheme of assessment and return forms treated set-off as part of the tax computation, and Rule 43 read with sections 42 and 46 showed that tax collected by the selling dealer and credited through set-off was tax in substance. Because the provision raised a presumption of concealment and ambiguity in a penal provision must be construed in favour of the assessee, the question was answered for the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:00:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 215 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153061</link>
      <description>For the explanation to section 36(2)(c) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the expression &quot;tax paid&quot; was held to include not only tax remitted to the Government treasury but also tax allowed by way of set-off under the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959. The scheme of assessment and return forms treated set-off as part of the tax computation, and Rule 43 read with sections 42 and 46 showed that tax collected by the selling dealer and credited through set-off was tax in substance. Because the provision raised a presumption of concealment and ambiguity in a penal provision must be construed in favour of the assessee, the question was answered for the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>