https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153044 The judgment allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity of addressing procedural requirements, such as pre-deposit under Sec. 35F, before delving into the substantive merits of the case. The detailed analysis of the issues involved highlighted the complexities surrounding credit entitlement, pre-deposit requirements, and the procedural obligations of appellate authorities in adjudicating such matters. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:05:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153044 The judgment allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity of addressing procedural requirements, such as pre-deposit under Sec. 35F, before delving into the substantive merits of the case. The detailed analysis of the issues involved highlighted the complexities surrounding credit entitlement, pre-deposit requirements, and the procedural obligations of appellate authorities in adjudicating such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153044