<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 172 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153028</link>
    <description>A taxing entry using the disjunctive phrase &quot;vegetable and edible oils&quot; was construed according to its plain meaning, so a commodity needed to satisfy either description, not both, to fall within the entry. As cotton seed oil was undisputedly vegetable oil, it was held to be covered by entry No. 7 of Part III of Schedule II to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, and therefore taxable under that entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 172 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153028</link>
      <description>A taxing entry using the disjunctive phrase &quot;vegetable and edible oils&quot; was construed according to its plain meaning, so a commodity needed to satisfy either description, not both, to fall within the entry. As cotton seed oil was undisputedly vegetable oil, it was held to be covered by entry No. 7 of Part III of Schedule II to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, and therefore taxable under that entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>