https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153023 Section 5(1)(b) of the Displaced Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954 was read as conferring revisional power over verified claims, including claims finally dealt with under the principal Act, because the statutory definition of a verified claim covered such final orders and the preamble could not narrow clear enacting words. That revisional power also extended to valuation, and rule 18 was not confined by ejusdem generis so as to exclude valuation-related grounds. On the record, however, a revisional order based on conjectures, surmises, and no legal evidence was vulnerable as an error of law apparent on the face of the record and could not stand. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2014 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153023 Section 5(1)(b) of the Displaced Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954 was read as conferring revisional power over verified claims, including claims finally dealt with under the principal Act, because the statutory definition of a verified claim covered such final orders and the preamble could not narrow clear enacting words. That revisional power also extended to valuation, and rule 18 was not confined by ejusdem generis so as to exclude valuation-related grounds. On the record, however, a revisional order based on conjectures, surmises, and no legal evidence was vulnerable as an error of law apparent on the face of the record and could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153023