https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153019 A writ petition challenging a Board direction and a consequential show cause notice was not entertained because it was filed more than two years after the impugned order, an available statutory remedy had not been pursued, and the penalty proceedings had not yet culminated in a final order. The court therefore declined to exercise jurisdiction under article 226, treated the challenge as premature and delayed, and left the assessing authority to decide the penalty issue according to law and the facts of the case. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:25:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153019 A writ petition challenging a Board direction and a consequential show cause notice was not entertained because it was filed more than two years after the impugned order, an available statutory remedy had not been pursued, and the penalty proceedings had not yet culminated in a final order. The court therefore declined to exercise jurisdiction under article 226, treated the challenge as premature and delayed, and left the assessing authority to decide the penalty issue according to law and the facts of the case. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153019