<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 243 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153004</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications for newly set-up small-scale industrial units were construed to grant the full five-year benefit from the date of commencement of production. The Patna HC held that the terminal date in Notifications Nos. S.O. 141 and S.O. 139 governed the life of the notifications and the class of eligible units, but did not curtail the substantive exemption period expressly conferred. Reading the notifications as a whole, the court rejected an interpretation that would create anomaly, absurdity, and manifest injustice, and preferred the construction favourable to the assessee. The restrictive orders and endorsements were quashed to the extent inconsistent with the five-year exemption, and the exemption certificates were directed to be corrected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 243 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153004</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications for newly set-up small-scale industrial units were construed to grant the full five-year benefit from the date of commencement of production. The Patna HC held that the terminal date in Notifications Nos. S.O. 141 and S.O. 139 governed the life of the notifications and the class of eligible units, but did not curtail the substantive exemption period expressly conferred. Reading the notifications as a whole, the court rejected an interpretation that would create anomaly, absurdity, and manifest injustice, and preferred the construction favourable to the assessee. The restrictive orders and endorsements were quashed to the extent inconsistent with the five-year exemption, and the exemption certificates were directed to be corrected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>