<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 160 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152974</link>
    <description>An implied sale of packing material could not be inferred merely because gunny bags passed with sugar sold in prescribed packing; no separate price was charged, no express bargain for the bags was shown, and the department failed to discharge the burden of proving a taxable sale, so the estimated value of the bags was not liable to sales tax. By contrast, sales of trucks, a jeep and a car were treated as business-related transactions because the amended definition of business covered dealings connected with, incidental to, or ancillary to the business activity, and the vehicles had been acquired for business use before being sold when no longer useful, so those sales were taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:49:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 160 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152974</link>
      <description>An implied sale of packing material could not be inferred merely because gunny bags passed with sugar sold in prescribed packing; no separate price was charged, no express bargain for the bags was shown, and the department failed to discharge the burden of proving a taxable sale, so the estimated value of the bags was not liable to sales tax. By contrast, sales of trucks, a jeep and a car were treated as business-related transactions because the amended definition of business covered dealings connected with, incidental to, or ancillary to the business activity, and the vehicles had been acquired for business use before being sold when no longer useful, so those sales were taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>