<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 139 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152967</link>
    <description>A sales tax notification granting a concessional rate to articles ordinarily prepared by halwais was held applicable to chaat preparations sold by the dealer. The expression &quot;halwai&quot; was given its ordinary, practical trade meaning because it was not defined, and items commonly sold at halwai shops, including papri, dahi, chatni, aalu-tikki, bhaturas, chhola and samosa, could fall within the concession. The beneficial object of the notification required a liberal construction, so the reduced rate could not be denied merely because the dealer also dealt in chaat preparations. The dealer&#039;s taxable turnover was therefore liable at 2 per cent, not 5 per cent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 139 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152967</link>
      <description>A sales tax notification granting a concessional rate to articles ordinarily prepared by halwais was held applicable to chaat preparations sold by the dealer. The expression &quot;halwai&quot; was given its ordinary, practical trade meaning because it was not defined, and items commonly sold at halwai shops, including papri, dahi, chatni, aalu-tikki, bhaturas, chhola and samosa, could fall within the concession. The beneficial object of the notification required a liberal construction, so the reduced rate could not be denied merely because the dealer also dealt in chaat preparations. The dealer&#039;s taxable turnover was therefore liable at 2 per cent, not 5 per cent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>