<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152945</link>
    <description>The term &quot;manufacture&quot; in a notification issued under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was read consistently with the Act&#039;s own definition because words in subordinate legislation ordinarily take the same meaning as in the enabling statute unless context requires otherwise. Applying that definition, dyeing and printing cloth was treated as manufacture since the process produced a new marketable commodity. On that basis, purchasing dealers were not in breach of the declarations in form T. The interpretation favoured the dealers, although the reference was ultimately treated as academic and returned to the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152945</link>
      <description>The term &quot;manufacture&quot; in a notification issued under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was read consistently with the Act&#039;s own definition because words in subordinate legislation ordinarily take the same meaning as in the enabling statute unless context requires otherwise. Applying that definition, dyeing and printing cloth was treated as manufacture since the process produced a new marketable commodity. On that basis, purchasing dealers were not in breach of the declarations in form T. The interpretation favoured the dealers, although the reference was ultimately treated as academic and returned to the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>