https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152936 The Court held that the Writ Petition under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was not maintainable as the order under Section 35F was treated as an order in appeal under Section 35G. The petitioners' request to substitute pre-deposit with a Bank Guarantee was rejected, emphasizing the need to follow the appeal process rather than resorting to a Writ Petition. The Court affirmed the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal and ruled out High Court interference, citing the Division Bench's determination on the nature of orders under Sections 35F and 35G. The Writ Petition was dismissed accordingly. en-us Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:25:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152936 The Court held that the Writ Petition under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was not maintainable as the order under Section 35F was treated as an order in appeal under Section 35G. The petitioners' request to substitute pre-deposit with a Bank Guarantee was rejected, emphasizing the need to follow the appeal process rather than resorting to a Writ Petition. The Court affirmed the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal and ruled out High Court interference, citing the Division Bench's determination on the nature of orders under Sections 35F and 35G. The Writ Petition was dismissed accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152936