<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 226 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152914</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court held that the four-year limit in section 19(1) governs only the initiation of escaped-assessment proceedings, and once validly initiated within time, those proceedings may continue to completion. It further held that penalty under section 19(2) can be imposed only in the course of making the assessment under section 19(1). Because the assessment had already been completed by the appellate order and revised assessment order before the penalty notice was issued, the penalty proceedings were not taken during the assessment process as required by the statute. The penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the writ appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 226 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152914</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court held that the four-year limit in section 19(1) governs only the initiation of escaped-assessment proceedings, and once validly initiated within time, those proceedings may continue to completion. It further held that penalty under section 19(2) can be imposed only in the course of making the assessment under section 19(1). Because the assessment had already been completed by the appellate order and revised assessment order before the penalty notice was issued, the penalty proceedings were not taken during the assessment process as required by the statute. The penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the writ appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>