<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 154 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152912</link>
    <description>For an appeal maintainability condition requiring deposit of admitted tax, the relevant appeal provision governs the required payment. Where returns for the assessment year were filed, section 9(1)(a) required deposit of the tax admitted in the returns or during proceedings, whichever was greater. Although section 8(1-C) deems interest on unpaid tax to be part of tax, it does not require deposit of accrued interest as an additional condition for entertaining an appeal unless section 9(1)(a) expressly so provides. Payment of admitted tax therefore satisfied the statutory requirement, and non-payment of interest did not defeat maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 154 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152912</link>
      <description>For an appeal maintainability condition requiring deposit of admitted tax, the relevant appeal provision governs the required payment. Where returns for the assessment year were filed, section 9(1)(a) required deposit of the tax admitted in the returns or during proceedings, whichever was greater. Although section 8(1-C) deems interest on unpaid tax to be part of tax, it does not require deposit of accrued interest as an additional condition for entertaining an appeal unless section 9(1)(a) expressly so provides. Payment of admitted tax therefore satisfied the statutory requirement, and non-payment of interest did not defeat maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>