<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 185 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152909</link>
    <description>Delegated taxing notifications under section 3-B of the Orissa Sales Tax Act cannot operate retrospectively unless the statute clearly authorises it, so a later superseding notification cannot wipe out liabilities already accrued under an earlier one. The Act also permits taxation at only one point in the same series of transactions: bamboos agreed to be severed and standing trees agreed to be severed are treated as the same commercial goods after severance, and cannot attract both sales tax and purchase tax on the same commodity. The bamboo arrangements were further characterised as executory rights in the nature of profit a prendre or agreements to sell, so no completed taxable purchase had occurred at the agreement stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 185 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152909</link>
      <description>Delegated taxing notifications under section 3-B of the Orissa Sales Tax Act cannot operate retrospectively unless the statute clearly authorises it, so a later superseding notification cannot wipe out liabilities already accrued under an earlier one. The Act also permits taxation at only one point in the same series of transactions: bamboos agreed to be severed and standing trees agreed to be severed are treated as the same commercial goods after severance, and cannot attract both sales tax and purchase tax on the same commodity. The bamboo arrangements were further characterised as executory rights in the nature of profit a prendre or agreements to sell, so no completed taxable purchase had occurred at the agreement stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>