<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 208 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152907</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was applied to a railway department&#039;s sale of coal-ash because the statutory definition of &quot;business&quot; was construed broadly to cover trade, commerce, manufacture, and incidental or ancillary transactions, even without profit. The court treated the railway&#039;s coal-ash sales as falling within that definition and held that a general statute binds the State and its instrumentalities unless expressly or by necessary implication excluded. The absence of any exclusion for the Central Government or its departments was significant, and the later amendment expressly including them was treated as clarificatory. The railway was therefore a dealer and liable to sales tax on coal-ash sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 208 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152907</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was applied to a railway department&#039;s sale of coal-ash because the statutory definition of &quot;business&quot; was construed broadly to cover trade, commerce, manufacture, and incidental or ancillary transactions, even without profit. The court treated the railway&#039;s coal-ash sales as falling within that definition and held that a general statute binds the State and its instrumentalities unless expressly or by necessary implication excluded. The absence of any exclusion for the Central Government or its departments was significant, and the later amendment expressly including them was treated as clarificatory. The railway was therefore a dealer and liable to sales tax on coal-ash sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>