<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 929 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152889</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, holding that the goods were not subject to confiscation under Section 113(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were neither dutiable nor prohibited. The tribunal also determined that the penalty imposed under Section 114 was not sustainable in this case. Consequently, the impugned order of confiscation and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:11:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 929 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152889</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, holding that the goods were not subject to confiscation under Section 113(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were neither dutiable nor prohibited. The tribunal also determined that the penalty imposed under Section 114 was not sustainable in this case. Consequently, the impugned order of confiscation and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>