https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152887 The court allowed the appeal by the party and rejected the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand on finished goods and reversal of Cenvat Credit on capital goods and inputs/raw materials. The court held that no separate application for remission was required as duty liability arises only upon goods' removal, not destruction by fire. The judge emphasized that the appellant's reply to the show cause notice sufficed and remission could be claimed if liable. The judgment relied on Tribunal precedents, disposing of all issues in favor of the party and rejecting the Revenue's contentions. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 May 2017 09:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152887 The court allowed the appeal by the party and rejected the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand on finished goods and reversal of Cenvat Credit on capital goods and inputs/raw materials. The court held that no separate application for remission was required as duty liability arises only upon goods' removal, not destruction by fire. The judge emphasized that the appellant's reply to the show cause notice sufficed and remission could be claimed if liable. The judgment relied on Tribunal precedents, disposing of all issues in favor of the party and rejecting the Revenue's contentions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152887