<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 845 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152883</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise civil appeal, the Supreme Court condoned the delay and then dismissed the appeal at the preliminary hearing stage. The text records no substantive reasoning, statutory interpretation, or determination on the merits, so only the procedural disposition can be stated from the available material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 845 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152883</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise civil appeal, the Supreme Court condoned the delay and then dismissed the appeal at the preliminary hearing stage. The text records no substantive reasoning, statutory interpretation, or determination on the merits, so only the procedural disposition can be stated from the available material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>