https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152879 Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was upheld against an Article 14 challenge because the classification was based on intelligible differentia and a rational nexus with the object of workable administration in specified territories. The provision applied only in defined areas and to offences not punishable with death, and its practical justification lay in distance, witness inconvenience, and the difficulty of securing jurors or assessors in remote regions. The text further notes that equal treatment was preserved within the covered areas, and that uneven administration by itself did not establish unconstitutional discrimination absent intentional or purposeful discrimination. Accordingly, no infringement of the constitutional right was found. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152879 Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was upheld against an Article 14 challenge because the classification was based on intelligible differentia and a rational nexus with the object of workable administration in specified territories. The provision applied only in defined areas and to offences not punishable with death, and its practical justification lay in distance, witness inconvenience, and the difficulty of securing jurors or assessors in remote regions. The text further notes that equal treatment was preserved within the covered areas, and that uneven administration by itself did not establish unconstitutional discrimination absent intentional or purposeful discrimination. Accordingly, no infringement of the constitutional right was found. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152879