<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 160 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152876</link>
    <description>Later judicial information can validly support reassessment where section 12(1) permits action if turnover has escaped assessment for any reason, and the provision is broader than a &quot;reason to believe&quot; test. The Court held that a later clarification on the taxability of woollen felts constituted relevant jurisdictional material, so the reassessment notices were valid. It also held that writ relief was ordinarily unavailable because the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act provided an efficacious statutory remedy structure, and no exceptional jurisdictional defect or palpable injustice was shown. The challenge to the reassessment notice therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 160 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152876</link>
      <description>Later judicial information can validly support reassessment where section 12(1) permits action if turnover has escaped assessment for any reason, and the provision is broader than a &quot;reason to believe&quot; test. The Court held that a later clarification on the taxability of woollen felts constituted relevant jurisdictional material, so the reassessment notices were valid. It also held that writ relief was ordinarily unavailable because the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act provided an efficacious statutory remedy structure, and no exceptional jurisdictional defect or palpable injustice was shown. The challenge to the reassessment notice therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>