<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 678 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152856</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission rejected the review petition filed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (ATFE) seeking reconsideration of its order. The Commission found ATFE&#039;s grounds for non-disclosure of information to be unsubstantial and directed the information to be provided to the appellant as previously ordered. The Commission emphasized transparency and accountability under the RTI Act, upholding its initial decision and dismissing ATFE&#039;s attempt to avoid disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 678 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152856</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission rejected the review petition filed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (ATFE) seeking reconsideration of its order. The Commission found ATFE&#039;s grounds for non-disclosure of information to be unsubstantial and directed the information to be provided to the appellant as previously ordered. The Commission emphasized transparency and accountability under the RTI Act, upholding its initial decision and dismissing ATFE&#039;s attempt to avoid disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>