<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 222 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152820</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 9 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1976, finding that retrospective imposition of penalties without reference to offences does not violate Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India. The Court clarified that penalties under the Sales Tax Act are not quasi-criminal in nature but are considered an additional tax. The petitioner&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 222 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152820</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 9 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1976, finding that retrospective imposition of penalties without reference to offences does not violate Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India. The Court clarified that penalties under the Sales Tax Act are not quasi-criminal in nature but are considered an additional tax. The petitioner&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>