https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152819 The appeal was dismissed for refund claims dated 17-7-1996 and 30-9-1996 due to non-production of original documents. However, the appeal was allowed for the refund claim dated 24-10-1996, requiring reconsideration by the original authority to address the unjust enrichment issue properly, granting the appellant a fair chance to present evidence and arguments. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152819 The appeal was dismissed for refund claims dated 17-7-1996 and 30-9-1996 due to non-production of original documents. However, the appeal was allowed for the refund claim dated 24-10-1996, requiring reconsideration by the original authority to address the unjust enrichment issue properly, granting the appellant a fair chance to present evidence and arguments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152819