<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 195 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152808</link>
    <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 permits exclusion of time spent obtaining a certified copy only for appeals, applications for leave to appeal, revision, or review; it does not extend to an application for reference under section 33(1) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Tribunal&#039;s long-standing practice could not expand that statutory scope, so exclusion of copy-obtaining time was unavailable. The Tribunal also had no jurisdiction to review and recall its earlier order condoning delay and directing a reference, because no error apparent on the face of the record was shown. A mistaken view of law or fact was insufficient to justify recall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 195 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152808</link>
      <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 permits exclusion of time spent obtaining a certified copy only for appeals, applications for leave to appeal, revision, or review; it does not extend to an application for reference under section 33(1) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Tribunal&#039;s long-standing practice could not expand that statutory scope, so exclusion of copy-obtaining time was unavailable. The Tribunal also had no jurisdiction to review and recall its earlier order condoning delay and directing a reference, because no error apparent on the face of the record was shown. A mistaken view of law or fact was insufficient to justify recall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>