<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1008 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-examination due to discrepancies in the imposition of penalties and lack of thorough examination of valuation basis and undervaluation allegations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and ensuring a proper evaluation of all aspects related to the case to uphold principles of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1008 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-examination due to discrepancies in the imposition of penalties and lack of thorough examination of valuation basis and undervaluation allegations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and ensuring a proper evaluation of all aspects related to the case to uphold principles of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>