<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (5) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152797</link>
    <description>Section 3 of the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1952 concerns the continued operation of confirmed detention orders during the extended life of the principal Act. Its construction treats the amended statute as incorporated into the principal Act, allowing such orders to continue rather than merely extending the parent legislation. The provision distinguishes detenus whose cases have been considered by an Advisory Board, with detention remaining subject to governmental revocation or modification. The discussion also addresses Parliament&#039;s power to prescribe maximum detention periods under article 22. Detention grounds must be read as a whole; allegations of establishing parallel authority through coercion may fall within statutory detention grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (5) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152797</link>
      <description>Section 3 of the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1952 concerns the continued operation of confirmed detention orders during the extended life of the principal Act. Its construction treats the amended statute as incorporated into the principal Act, allowing such orders to continue rather than merely extending the parent legislation. The provision distinguishes detenus whose cases have been considered by an Advisory Board, with detention remaining subject to governmental revocation or modification. The discussion also addresses Parliament&#039;s power to prescribe maximum detention periods under article 22. Detention grounds must be read as a whole; allegations of establishing parallel authority through coercion may fall within statutory detention grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>