https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152786 An order partly refusing stay of recovery of tax was invalid because the proviso to section 11(3) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 required recorded reasons for rejecting the stay request, and the cyclostyled order gave none for declining stay of the balance demand. The partial refusal was therefore quashed and the stay application was remitted for fresh decision. On the assessment challenge, the writ court declined to examine the merits because an appeal against the assessment order was already pending, and the assessee was left to pursue that alternate remedy. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:45:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152786 An order partly refusing stay of recovery of tax was invalid because the proviso to section 11(3) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 required recorded reasons for rejecting the stay request, and the cyclostyled order gave none for declining stay of the balance demand. The partial refusal was therefore quashed and the stay application was remitted for fresh decision. On the assessment challenge, the writ court declined to examine the merits because an appeal against the assessment order was already pending, and the assessee was left to pursue that alternate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 27 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152786