<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 242 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152775</link>
    <description>Under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, a legal representative of a deceased dealer is deemed to be the dealer, with liability limited to the assets of the deceased in the representative&#039;s hands. Because valid demand notices had already been served on the deceased dealer and default had occurred before death, the statutory default was treated as continuing against the legal representative. A fresh notice of demand was therefore not required before recovery of the arrears, and the amount collected from the legal representative was not refundable. The contrary foreign authority was considered inapplicable because the Act contains an express deeming provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:55:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 242 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152775</link>
      <description>Under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, a legal representative of a deceased dealer is deemed to be the dealer, with liability limited to the assets of the deceased in the representative&#039;s hands. Because valid demand notices had already been served on the deceased dealer and default had occurred before death, the statutory default was treated as continuing against the legal representative. A fresh notice of demand was therefore not required before recovery of the arrears, and the amount collected from the legal representative was not refundable. The contrary foreign authority was considered inapplicable because the Act contains an express deeming provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>