<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 242 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152767</link>
    <description>A concessional tax scheme for raw material was treated as conditional on use in manufacture and sale of the finished goods within Rajasthan or in inter-State trade. A penalty for breach of those conditions was held to be an incidental anti-evasion measure, not a direct restriction on trade under Article 301, and the provision was upheld. The special penalty under section 5C(2) was applied instead of the general wrong-declaration provision because the statute specifically governed breach of the concessional conditions. The levy was also held not to be a second tax under section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, as it was punitive and compensatory in character.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 242 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152767</link>
      <description>A concessional tax scheme for raw material was treated as conditional on use in manufacture and sale of the finished goods within Rajasthan or in inter-State trade. A penalty for breach of those conditions was held to be an incidental anti-evasion measure, not a direct restriction on trade under Article 301, and the provision was upheld. The special penalty under section 5C(2) was applied instead of the general wrong-declaration provision because the statute specifically governed breach of the concessional conditions. The levy was also held not to be a second tax under section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, as it was punitive and compensatory in character.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>