https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152765 The Supreme Court held that the absence of the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, did not invalidate the Departmental Promotion Committee proceedings. The Court emphasized the validity and binding nature of the Office Memorandum as a comprehensive guide on Committee procedures, finding no conflict with the skeletal Rules. The Court overturned the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, remanding the case for a comprehensive review, stressing the need to consider all aspects. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 22 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152765 The Supreme Court held that the absence of the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, did not invalidate the Departmental Promotion Committee proceedings. The Court emphasized the validity and binding nature of the Office Memorandum as a comprehensive guide on Committee procedures, finding no conflict with the skeletal Rules. The Court overturned the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, remanding the case for a comprehensive review, stressing the need to consider all aspects. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152765